ResearchNotebook 001

Number theory / An open investigation

Goldbach &
the geometry
of primes.

A simple question. An infinite frontier.
Exploring the structure of primes by changing the way we see numbers.

FIG. 01THE ULAM SPIRAL
Prime 2Prime 3Prime 5Prime 7Prime 11Prime 13Prime 17Prime 19Prime 23Prime 29Prime 31Prime 37Prime 41Prime 43Prime 47Prime 53Prime 59Prime 61Prime 67Prime 71Prime 73Prime 79Prime 83Prime 89Prime 97Prime 101Prime 103Prime 107Prime 109Prime 113Prime 127Prime 131Prime 137Prime 139Prime 149Prime 151Prime 157Prime 163Prime 167Prime 173Prime 179Prime 181Prime 191Prime 193Prime 197Prime 199Prime 211Prime 223Prime 227Prime 229Prime 233Prime 239Prime 241Prime 251Prime 257Prime 263Prime 269Prime 271Prime 277Prime 281Prime 283Prime 293Prime 307Prime 311Prime 313Prime 317Prime 331Prime 337Prime 347Prime 349Prime 353Prime 359Prime 367Prime 373Prime 379Prime 383Prime 389Prime 397Prime 401Prime 409Prime 419Prime 421Prime 431Prime 433Prime 439Prime 443Prime 449Prime 457Prime 461Prime 463Prime 467Prime 479Prime 487Prime 491Prime 499Prime 503Prime 509Prime 521Prime 523Prime 541Prime 547Prime 557Prime 563Prime 569Prime 571Prime 577Prime 587Prime 593Prime 599Prime 601Prime 607Prime 613Prime 617Prime 619Prime 631Prime 641Prime 643Prime 647Prime 653Prime 659Prime 661Prime 673Prime 677Prime 683Prime 691Prime 701Prime 709Prime 719Prime 727Prime 733Prime 739Prime 743Prime 751Prime 757Prime 761Prime 769Prime 773Prime 787Prime 797Prime 809Prime 811Prime 821Prime 823Prime 827Prime 829Prime 839Prime 853Prime 857Prime 859Prime 863Prime 877Prime 881Prime 883Prime 887Prime 907Prime 911Prime 919Prime 929Prime 937Prime 941Prime 947Prime 953Prime 967Prime 971Prime 977Prime 983Prime 991Prime 997Prime 1009Prime 1013Prime 1019Prime 1021Prime 1031Prime 1033Prime 1039Prime 1049Prime 1051Prime 1061Prime 1063Prime 1069Prime 1087Prime 1091Prime 1093Prime 1097Prime 1103Prime 1109Prime 1117Prime 1123Prime 1129Prime 1151Prime 1153Prime 1163Prime 1171Prime 1181Prime 1187Prime 1193Prime 1201Prime 1213Prime 1217Prime 1223Prime 1229Prime 1231Prime 1237Prime 1249Prime 1259Prime 1277Prime 1279Prime 1283Prime 1289Prime 1291Prime 1297Prime 1301Prime 1303Prime 1307Prime 1319Prime 1321Prime 1327Prime 1361Prime 1367Prime 1373Prime 1381Prime 1399Prime 1409Prime 1423Prime 1427Prime 1429Prime 1433Prime 1439Prime 1447Prime 1451Prime 1453Prime 1459Prime 1471Prime 1481Prime 1483Prime 1487Prime 1489Prime 1493Prime 1499Prime 1511Prime 1523Prime 1531Prime 1543Prime 1549Prime 1553Prime 1559Prime 1567Prime 1571Prime 1579Prime 1583Prime 1597Prime 1601Prime 1607Prime 1609Prime 1613Prime 1619Prime 1621Prime 1627Prime 1637Prime 1657Prime 1663Prime 1667Prime 1669Prime 1693Prime 1697Prime 1699Prime 1709Prime 1721Prime 1723Prime 1733Prime 1741Prime 1747Prime 1753Prime 1759Prime 1777Prime 1783Prime 1787Prime 1789Prime 1801Prime 1811Prime 1823Prime 1831Prime 1847Prime 1861Prime 1867Prime 1871Prime 1873Prime 1877Prime 1879Prime 1889Prime 1901Prime 1907Prime 1913Prime 1931Prime 1933Prime 1949Prime 1951Prime 1973Prime 1979Prime 1987Prime 1993Prime 1997Prime 1999Prime 2003Prime 2011Prime 2017Prime 2027Prime 2029Prime 2039Prime 2053Prime 2063Prime 2069Prime 2081Prime 2083Prime 2087Prime 2089Prime 2099Prime 2111Prime 2113Prime 2129Prime 2131Prime 2137Prime 2141Prime 2143Prime 2153Prime 2161Prime 2179Prime 2203Prime 2207Prime 2213Prime 2221Prime 2237Prime 2239Prime 2243Prime 2251Prime 2267Prime 2269Prime 2273Prime 2281Prime 2287Prime 2293Prime 2297Prime 2309Prime 2311Prime 2333Prime 2339Prime 2341Prime 2347Prime 2351Prime 2357Prime 2371Prime 2377Prime 2381Prime 2383Prime 2389Prime 2393Prime 2399
2,401 integers. 357 primes.Arithmetic, made visible.
Operator bounds & correlation analysis4 research directions12 recorded milestonesUpdated

01 / Research update

From visual ideas
to arithmetic bounds.

Research through .
This public update: .

The investigation now centers on a joint divisibility operator: a score that is bounded above by the prime-pair indicator. Exact certificates, averaged arguments, and residue corrections give different kinds of progress. The remaining difficulty is control of reflected correlations.

Exact finite computation124,998

consecutive targets checked

Positive scores at every even N from 6 through 250,000. This is a finite operator experiment.

Inspect the range →
Exact finite certificate≥ 853

prime pairs certified

For N = 1,000,000 with initial sieve through 7; the rational lower bound is 1705/2.

Inspect the certificate →
Numerical constant estimateκ ≈ 0.28427

a positive averaged coefficient

The rigorous bounds are 29/300 < κ < 3/10. The decimal comes from numerical integration.

Read the averaged argument →
Latest comparison · under review

The saved October 30 draft develops a Fourier comparison aimed at almost-all positivity for the operator. Its full audit and combined conclusion remain pending here. Even an almost-all result can leave exceptional targets; positivity at every target remains unproved.

Read the draft’s scope →
What the score measures

For each retained pair r + s = N, count distinct omitted small divisors J and canonical late divisors D on each side. Set F = 1 − J − D, H = J(J − 1)/2 + JD, and E = F + H. The score is q = (FₗEᵣ + EₗFᵣ)/2. With the proved factor restrictions, q is at most the indicator that both members are prime.

For the growing-cutoff work, the initial sieve runs through floor(N¹ᐟ⁵), the small/late dividing threshold is floor(N¹ᐟ³), and late divisors satisfy p² ≤ n. Sum q over floor(√N) < r ≤ N/2 to obtain S(N); C(N) counts prime pairs in that same interval. Thus S(N) ≤ C(N), and a positive S certifies pairs. Positive average, positive proportion, almost all, and every target are distinct statements.

See the ordering and loss identity →
Inspect exact finite band totals
Saved exact totals over even X < N ≤ 2X
XEven targetsΣS / ΣC, exactDecimal
1,00050012993/168560.770823
10,0005,0001515619/19641660.771635
50,00025,0006141758/88984610.690205
100,00050,00041198646/626970190.657107
125,00062,500127177897/1883728020.675139

Bands overlap and must not be added as independent populations. The finite ratios oscillate and remain well above the limiting κ estimate here. They supply neither a convergence rate nor a proof of the asymptotic argument.

Evidence you can inspect

Curated notes, full finite data, exact verifiers, and source hashes. Project derivations and AI-assisted reviews are working research, without a claim of peer review or novelty.

Download research snapshot ↓Source hashes ↗

02 / The question

Every even number.
Two primes.

The strong Goldbach conjecture asks whether every even integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes, allowing the two primes to be equal.

N = p + qN ≥ 4, N even; p, q prime

For this project, the starting point is geometric: two primes adding to 2m sit at equal distances on opposite sides of m. What becomes visible when we change coordinates, distances, or operators?

Current project status: exact finite certificates, project derivations for averages and a positive proportion, and an analytic comparison draft under review. No proof of the binary conjecture is claimed. The small browser experiments below illustrate the arithmetic; the larger research evidence is provided separately above.

03 / The experimental desk

Get a feel for the arithmetic.

Choose an even number. Inspect its prime pairs, change the geometry, and compare the counts. These introductory experiments are separate from the research computations.

Interactive experimentComputed in your browser · 4 ≤ N ≤ 2,000

Unordered prime pairs

6ways to write 100 = p + q

Each pair counted once, p ≤ q
Prime pairs reflected around N / 2
3 + 9711 + 8917 + 8329 + 7141 + 5947 + 53

Every arc joins two primes whose sum is N. The shared center is N / 2. Equal primes are allowed; 4 = 2 + 2 is included.

04 / Research directions

New views of an old problem.

The initial coordinate experiments now connect to joint operators, local arithmetic corrections, and Fourier analysis. Each direction retains a precise open question.

01Project derivation

Compact residue geometry

d(x, y) = Σⱼ 2⁻ʲ · 1[xⱼ ≠ yⱼ]

Represent each integer by its residues modulo all odd primes. The bounded product space preserves distinct integer labels, while translation and Goldbach reflection preserve distance. Residue averaging now has an exact arithmetic role.

Open question

How can residue projections isolate the genuinely unexplained reflected correlation?

02Project derivation

Complete local normalization

K(N) = C₂ ∏ₚ∣N, p>2 (p−1)/(p−2)

Any fixed finite residue correction leaves a systematic contribution from omitted primes. The full local factor is half the classical Goldbach singular series in this project’s parity convention. Its local mean-square tail is controlled separately.

Open question

What remains of the arithmetic error after every local correction is included?

03Finite & averaged results

Joint divisibility operators

q = (FₗEᵣ + EₗFᵣ) / 2

Track small and canonical late divisors on both summands. The pointwise score is at most the prime-pair indicator. Its sum has a positive averaged coefficient and is positive on a fixed positive proportion of sufficiently large even targets.

Open question

Can the negative reflected correlations be controlled at every target?

04Comparison draft under review

Frozen weights & Fourier comparison

Σ |Tₙ − (fₓ ∗ eₓ)(N)|² = O(X³ / log⁵ X)

The moving cutoffs can be frozen over X < N ≤ 2X at a smaller mean-square error than the target scale. A saved circle-method draft compares the frozen sequences with scaled prime weights; its full audit is still the next step.

Open question

Does the complete comparison justify the proposed almost-all conclusion, with every hypothesis checked?

C₂ = ∏ₚ>₂ (1 − 1/(p − 1)²). K is half the classical Goldbach singular series in this normalization. For the transfer estimate, the sum is over even X < N ≤ 2X; ∗ denotes discrete convolution. The original bounded-axis and factor-count ideas remain in the October 16 entries.

05 / Progress notebook

A record of the work.

Dated project derivations, exact computations, and drafts carry their own evidence labels. Earlier constructions are retained as the investigation develops.

Next investigation

Complete the audit of the frozen-weight Fourier comparison, combine it with the moving-threshold reduction, and state precisely what follows for almost all targets. All-target positivity remains open.

Planned
  1. Draft · under review

    A circle-method route toward almost-all positivity

    A saved draft develops a uniform Fourier comparison between the frozen F/E weights and scaled von Mangoldt weights. The combined almost-all conclusion is pending a final mathematical audit.

    Read the mathematical note

    The proposed comparison has error O(X log log X / log² X) in the supremum Fourier norm. With Parseval and the classical almost-all prime-convolution input, it would give a normalized mean-square error o(X³/log⁴ X). The audit must check factor constraints, major and minor arcs, canonical late divisors, and the transfer back to moving weights. Even a completed almost-all result could leave exceptional targets. This is neither a new claim about ordinary Goldbach nor an all-target proof.

  2. Project derivation

    Moving cutoffs can be frozen at the required scale

    The saved argument bounds the total squared moving/frozen convolution difference by O(X³/log⁵ X) over a doubling interval. This is smaller than the mean-square scale needed for the proposed almost-all transfer.

    Read the mathematical note

    Only O(X/log² X) rough integers can change when the fifth-root and cube-root cutoffs move from X to 2X. A fixed nonnegative convolution dominates the target-dependent error; Young’s inequality supplies the norm bound, including the square-root endpoint terms. The canonical test p² ≤ n depends on the summand and remains unchanged. Exact support checks cover five finite bands. The reduction alone does not estimate the frozen convolution’s arithmetic error.

  3. Project derivation

    Finite local corrections leave an unavoidable residue bias

    Every fixed finite set of residue corrections leaves a systematic contribution from omitted primes. The complete correction recovers the classical singular series, with the project’s parity normalization.

    Read the mathematical note

    Modulo 3 already distinguishes targets divisible by 3 from the other two classes. Fixed-arithmetic-progression prime averages show why the earlier uncorrected remainder cannot be negligible in mean absolute value. The complete factor K(N) is at least 1/2; its approximation by odd-prime local products has mean-square tail below 3/(2y²), with y fixed before the integer-average limit. That tail bound concerns K itself, not the remaining arithmetic correlation.

  4. Exact construction & counterexample

    Bounded geometry becomes a reflection-compatible projection

    Prime-residue coordinates give an injective bounded representation of integers in a compact product. Residue averaging commutes with Goldbach reflection. Refining the residues need not reduce the remainder’s magnitude.

    Read the mathematical note

    The metric is the weighted sum of coordinate disagreements. Translation and reflection are isometries; no largest integer is introduced. Nested residue averages give an exact signed decomposition, rather than monotone error improvement. At N = 1,000, refining M = 1 to M = 3 increases the absolute residual from 1187/234 to 554/39. The saved computation checks 37 partitions across ten targets. This is a product of prime-residue rings, not the full prime-power profinite completion.

  5. Project derivation

    Positive scores on a fixed positive proportion of targets

    The positive first moment, a standard upper-bound sieve, and a bounded singular-factor second moment yield positive operator scores on a fixed positive proportion of sufficiently large even targets.

    Read the mathematical note

    There exist η, δ > 0 and X₀ such that at least δX even N in (X, 2X] have S(N) ≥ ηN/log² N whenever X ≥ X₀. One may take η = 3κ/16. No numerical δ or starting threshold is supplied. This concerns the project’s operator; it does not show that the exceptional proportion tends to zero or that every target succeeds.

  6. Project derivation · exact sign certificate

    A positive averaged coefficient, with a rigorous sign

    The dyadic total of the growing-cutoff operator has leading coefficient κ = cF·cE. Exact rational estimates establish 29/300 < κ < 3/10; numerical integration gives κ ≈ 0.28426749.

    Read the mathematical note

    The project derives Σ S(N) = [κ + o(1)]·3X²/(4 log² X), summing even N in (X, 2X], from prime-factor simplex integrals and the prime number theorem. The ratio of total operator scores to total restricted prime-pair counts tends to κ. The displayed decimal is a numerical estimate, not a rigorous decimal enclosure. Positivity of a total does not imply positivity at each target, and the eventual onset is not quantified.

  7. Exact finite computation

    124,998 consecutive even targets checked

    Every even target from 6 through 250,000 has a positive operator score in the saved exhaustive run. The computation uses exact integer convolution and exact boundary and midpoint corrections.

    Read the mathematical note

    The stored population contains precisely 124,998 targets, with no gaps, zero scores, or negative scores. It matches 4,998 earlier direct profiles and 45 additional direct profiles. The website’s update checks the complete saved population, rather than inferring a contiguous range from scattered samples. This is a finite operator experiment, not an extension of the published global Goldbach verification bound or an asymptotic proof.

  8. Exact identity

    A growing sieve orders the lower bounds

    Within the proved cutoff range, raising the initial sieve can only increase the operator sum; at the cube-root endpoint it recovers the restricted prime-pair count exactly.

    Read the mathematical note

    For floor(N¹ᐟ⁵) ≤ w ≤ v ≤ floor(N¹ᐟ³), S_w(N) ≤ S_v(N) ≤ C(N). Removed candidates have nonpositive scores. An exact nonnegative penalty identity records the loss from prime/composite and composite/composite correlations. At N = 1,000,000 with w = 15, the saved score is 3,274 and the loss is 2,108, reaching the actual restricted count 5,382. Evaluating the exact endpoint still entails prime-detection work.

  9. Exact finite certificate

    A certified lower bound of 853 prime pairs

    At N = 1,000,000 with initial sieve through 7, retaining three cross-side divisibility moments makes the exact direct pair-count certificate positive: 1705/2, hence at least 853 pairs.

    Read the mathematical note

    The independent verifier reconstructs 99 safe states, checks all 25 moment inputs, verifies pointwise inequalities and primal/dual equality, and scans divisibility independently of the discovery solver. The domain is floor(√N) < r ≤ N/2, with s = N − r. The actual restricted count, used only as a subsequent check, is 5,382. This fixed-wheel benchmark is distinct from the growing-cutoff score used in the averaged work; neither number proves uniform positivity.

  10. Identity checked

    An exact factor-count reformulation

    For the stated integer domain, D(m, d) ≥ 0 and D(m, d) = 0 precisely when m − d and m + d are both prime.

    Read the mathematical note

    Ω counts prime factors with multiplicity. Since m² − d² = (m − d)(m + d), and both factors are at least 2, each contributes at least one prime factor. The total is 2 exactly when both factors are prime. This is an equivalent restatement of the pair condition; computing Ω still requires arithmetic work.

  11. Construction defined

    Compression that preserves midpoint symmetry

    A bounded coordinate centered at m sends m − d and m + d to exact reflections. Centering at zero generally changes their spacing around the transformed midpoint.

    Read the mathematical note

    The map x ↦ (x − m)/(s + |x − m|), with s > 0, sends the pair to −d/(s+d) and d/(s+d). The global map x ↦ x/(s+|x|) is injective but nonlinear, so it does not generally preserve arithmetic midpoints. The coordinate identity is exact; an advantage for proving Goldbach remains an open question.

  12. Research agenda

    A program built around representations

    Earlier visual work on rotated prime spirals and alternative grids informs four directions: bounded axes, divisibility coordinates, new operators, and the role of constants.

    Read the mathematical note

    The guiding question is what addition looks like in each representation. For Goldbach, p + q = 2m is a reflection about m on the ordinary number line. Experiments should preserve enough information to recover the original arithmetic and distinguish imposed symmetry from a new prime relationship.

Ambitious with ideas.
Exacting with evidence.

This notebook is curated from an ongoing research conversation with ChatGPT Codex. AI assists with constructions, computation, and critique; mathematical claims need explicit reasoning and review.

Observations, equivalent reformulations, and proofs have different evidential roles. New milestones should include their assumptions, supporting argument or reproducible computation, and remaining limitations.

View the notebook’s revision history ↗

06 / Reading & context

Built on a long conversation.

  1. 254A, Notes 8: The Hardy–Littlewood circle method and Vinogradov’s theorem

    Terence Tao · 2015

    Established analytic inputs and the classical almost-all Goldbach statement. Applying them to the project’s F/E weights requires the additional comparison under review.

  2. 254A, Notes 4: Some sieve theory

    Terence Tao · 2015

    Upper-bound sieve background used in the project’s positive-proportion derivation. These established methods are credited separately from the project-specific operator.

  3. Empirical verification of the even Goldbach conjecture and computation of prime gaps up to 4 · 10¹⁸

    T. Oliveira e Silva, S. Herzog & S. Pardi · Mathematics of Computation, 2014

    A published computational verification bound; it is external work, not a result of this project.

  4. The ternary Goldbach conjecture is true

    Harald Andrés Helfgott · 2013

    The three-prime theorem concerns odd integers greater than 5. It is distinct from the binary conjecture studied here.

  5. Rational Curves

    Ching-Kuang Shene · Michigan Technological University

    Background for expressing circle geometry with rational functions.

The notebook continues.← All research